Nevada Supreme Court Rejects Application of Anti-Stacking Rules for Concurrent Negligence

Steve Klearman
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 535
Posted by Steve KlearmanNovember 05, 2009 3:16 PM
Tags: None

In Delgado v. American Family Ins. Group, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 44 (October 1, 2009), the Nevada Supreme Court was faced with the question of whether the passenger in an automobile who is injured by the concurrent negligence of the drivers in a two-car accident "may recover under the permissive driver's insurance policy both liability benefits based on the policyholder's negligence and underinsured motorist benefits based on the other driver's underinsured status."

The plaintiff passenger had made a claim against both at-fault drivers' insurance policies and recovered the liability limits under those policies. She then made a claim against the permissive driver's underinsured motorist policy, alleging that the at-fault policies did not cover the extent of her damages.

The Court rejected the application of the anti-stacking rules under the Nevada case law. In Nevada, once a passenger has recovered under the vehicle owner's liability policy--whether that policy is the permissive driver's policy or the passenger's own policy--the passenger may not also recover under the owner's uninsured/underinsured motorist policy, although the guest passenger may stack their own UM/UIM coverage with the benefits they receive from the owner's policy. Baker v. Criterion Insurance, 107 Nev. 25, 805 P.2d 599 (1991).

Distinguishing the anti-stacking situation, the Court concluded that "a passenger who is injured by two concurrently negligent drivers may recover from both the permissive driver's single insurance policy liability benefits based on the permissive driver's negligence and underinsured motorist benefits based on the other driver's underinsured status."

The Court clarified that the antistacking rule under Nevada law was not implicated by this case. Thus, a passenger whose injuries are attributable to two jointly negligent drivers and who exhausts the liability limits of the permissive driver's policy without satisfying his damages may seek recovery under the permissive driver's underinsured motorist policy based on the other driver's underinsured status.

0 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Leave a comment

Have an opinion? There are 3 ways to leave a public comment (or click here to email the author privately).

For information on acceptable commenting practices, please visit Lifehacker's guide to weblog comments. Comments containing spam or profanity will be filtered or deleted.

Method 1: Guests

Provide the information below. Your email address will not be published or sold.

Name:

Email Address:

URL:

Method 2: Facebook Users

Connect using your facebook account.

Method 3: InjuryBoard Members and Contributors

Please sign in

Comments:

5000 characters remaining.




Subscribe to InjuryBoard Reno

InjuryBoard Reno RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board Reno is brought to you by Steven J. Klearman & Associates

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Steven J. Klearman & Associates 866-735-1102 Ext 535 www.NevadaInjuries.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: Reno, Battle Mountain, Carson, Elko, Ely, Eureka, Gardnerville, Lovelock, Sparks, Sun Valley, Winnemucca and All Surrounding Areas
437 W. Plumb Lane, Reno, Nevada 89509 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address